tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3793782800729950147.post5076236450756496535..comments2024-03-26T21:29:07.190-07:00Comments on Rejoice, and be exceeding glad...: A Family History Mission: More Unusual Archival FindsJames Tannerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3793782800729950147.post-62240354691980804492018-04-14T09:02:57.775-07:002018-04-14T09:02:57.775-07:00Apparently, Mary Holmes was his "mistress&quo...Apparently, Mary Holmes was his "mistress" for years. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junius_Brutus_Booth. That is the explanation, apparently. The entries in the Family Tree are pretty well messed up as they usually are with any well known historical figure. People don't bother to look at the well established history before adding spouses and making changes. James Tannerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3793782800729950147.post-67120720332184473402018-04-14T08:18:52.756-07:002018-04-14T08:18:52.756-07:00James looking at the FamilySearch records I notice...James looking at the FamilySearch records I noticed something a bit strange on the marriage date of Junius Booth and Mary Holmes, 1851. Junius is listed to have died in 1852 and their first child Richard was born 1819. Perhaps in all your document digging you may come across the answer for that one. I am thinking that their marriage would have been closser to 1817 or 1818. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16352597472175502121noreply@blogger.com