tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3793782800729950147.post790723712334460857..comments2024-03-26T21:29:07.190-07:00Comments on Rejoice, and be exceeding glad...: This Blog has been Banned by FacebookJames Tannerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3793782800729950147.post-8357999313658254942020-01-10T06:49:03.936-08:002020-01-10T06:49:03.936-08:00Thanks Bonnie. Thanks Bonnie. James Tannerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02989059644120454647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3793782800729950147.post-87269100322433921742020-01-09T21:58:17.159-08:002020-01-09T21:58:17.159-08:00James, this is really offensive on Facebook's ...James, this is really offensive on Facebook's part! Thank heavens that the other media platforms and your blogs have not been censored! Everything anymore just seems to be so completely upside down. Keep doing the right thing! Bonnie<br />Bonniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14059667593315041564noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3793782800729950147.post-47721908071008550182020-01-09T04:47:54.020-08:002020-01-09T04:47:54.020-08:00This blog does not violate those community standar...This blog does not violate those community standards. Facebook has defamed you by saying that it does. Something that should definitely be written into US federal law is that when a company censors in this way it should be compelled to be specific as to what content has violated precisely which of the community standards. This would both improve transparency and also open up companies to considerable legal liability for their censorious activities. Where such purported violations do not actually exist then a legal remedy should be available to not only force the company to give restitution but force them to pay substantial statutory punitive damages for their censorship and indeed force them to pay the court costs of the party they have wrongly censored.<br /><br />Such a law would greatly reduce unwarranted corporate censorship as it would cumulatively cost the censorious companies a great deal of money, time and effort to defend the claims. Alternatively it would force them to actually be explicit in their terms and conditions about unwarranted censorship so people would know about that censorship beforehand and therefore know to avoid doing business with the company in question.Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05555471831028752100noreply@blogger.com