Sunday, August 18, 2019
Thursday, August 15, 2019
We hope to see you there.
Rootstech 2019 London will be held October 24th to 26th in the ExCel Conference Center in London, England.
Tuesday, August 13, 2019
The Family History Guide is a FamilySearch.org Partner Program that is a free learning, research, training, and activities center for family history. It is also a world-class family history learning system with thousands of linked resources used by learners in over 150 countries and approved by FamilySearch as an official training resource. The mission of The Family History Guide is to greatly increase the number of people actively involved in family history worldwide and to make everyone's family history journey easier, more efficient, and more enjoyable.
The Family History Guide is now directly linked from FamilySearch.org.
I am quite certain that very few of the users of the FamilySearch.org website are aware of the tremendous resources linked under the Help Center. Here is a screenshot of the pull-down menu when you click on the Help link in the upper right-hand corner of the FamilySearch.org home page when you sign in.
There are several linked paths that take you information about and links to The Family History Guide from this menu. For example, the Learning Center link has several linked videos that tell about The Family History Guide. Here is a screenshot showing links to videos about The Family History Guide in several different languages. I found these by searching for videos by Bob Taylor, one of the main participants in The Family History Guide program.
The main connection between the FamilySearch.org website and The Family History Guide is through the Helper Resources selection shown above. The link is located in the "Additional Resources" section.
I realize that this is a lot of clicks, but it is well worth knowing about. It is important to know that The Family History Guide is an integral part of the learning and research available through FamilySearch partners. When you click on the FamilySearch.org Basics link, you go directly to The Family History Guide.
Please take time to explore all of the wonderful resources that are available for research and learning both on the FamilySearch.org website and The Family History Guide website.
Friday, August 9, 2019
During the past few weeks, I have been tabulating the changes to the FamilySearch.org Family Tree that I have been receiving by email because I watch 302 people. If you want to know all about this process of watching individuals in the Family Tree, please look at the following
My question was exactly how many of those ill-advised changes I was seeing weekly in the Family Tree were made without providing a source for the information added or removed. After weeks of tabulating the changes, the average settled on a surprising 87%. Yes, 87% of the changes were made without a supporting source. I decided at this point to add a commentary and suspend the review until sometime in the future if the changes continue to be a challenge.
The bulk of the changes observed were made to a very small number of people. In fact, of the 475 changes made to those on my Watch List during the weeks of my study, 310 of the consequential changes were made to only 11 people and one person had 156 consequential changes. Although I did not keep track of the corrections, my impression was that almost all of the unsupported consequential changes we corrected in a very short time. However, those individuals with most changes were mostly a disaster because the information on any given day could be inaccurate.
In all, during the time period of the study, there were 81 people with a combined total of 475 significant changes and 394 of those changes were unsupported by any mention of a source. The time involved for one person to check every single change would be overwhelming. The only thing that saved the data from ultimate destruction was that there were a number of people evidently watching these individuals and correcting the unsupported changes.
Unsupported, consequential changes made to the Family Tree are, in fact, a major issue with the future viability of the whole Family Tree project. I cannot see any way that I can measure how many new people were added to the Family Tree during the study period, but I can only assume that the new people are being added with about the same level of lack of supporting documentation.
As I have stated many times in past blog posts, the problem is not with FamilySearch or the Family Tree: the Family Tree is the solution, not the problem. The basic issue is how to maintain a viable and accurate Family Tree and still maintain an open and collaborative structure? As I have also written before, there is a need for a rating system to rate the credibility of any information in the Family Tree similar to the widely used "star" system and there is also a need for some further requirements helping people to realize that a source is necessary for making changes or adding new information. I am thinking that one way this could be accomplished is to mark any information added or change made without a source statement as unreliable. So, if I entered a birth date and failed to reference a source, the entry would be marked with a red exclamation mark and listed as unreliable. The star system could also be extended to listed sources so that researchers could express opinions on their reliability.
There are probably other solutions that could achieve the same results, but there is a real need to get some control over the lop-sided addition of unsupported information.
Monday, August 5, 2019
The idea of having a place on the FamilySearch.org website to reserve Temple Ordinances is to allow members the opportunity to perform those ordinances for their own ancestors and relatives. However, reserving an excessive number of ordinances is counterproductive. Locking the ordinances up in a huge Reserved List beyond what could be completed in a reasonable period of time, does not benefit the individual who reserved the ordinances or those ancestors and relatives who are waiting for their ordinances to be done. Adding available ordinances to your reserved list is not a game where the highest number reserved wins. You and others benefit from performing the proxy ordinances in the Temples.
Unfortunately, not all those who are working on the FamilySearch.org Family Tree for the purpose of finding ancestors and relatives who need to have their Temple Ordinances performed understand this principle. As a result, FamilySearch has implemented an automatic expiration date that will apply to all ordinances according to the following rules:
- In general, ordinance reservations expire two years from the reservation date.
- Ordinance reservations you share with someone expire two years from the original reservation date.
- Ordinance reservations expire after 90 days if they were retrieved from the temple reservation list by Ordinances Ready. (Learn more about Ordinances Ready and how it searches for ordinances.)
- When you reserve multiple ordinances for the same ancestor, the ordinance reservation will be extended for one year if at least one ordinance is completed before the expiration date.
When you share your reserved ordinances with the Temples, those of your family who are using the Ordinances Ready app will have access to those previously reserved ordinances.
Saturday, August 3, 2019
This will be the last in this series of analyzing the Weekly Change Reports from FamilySearch.org about the Family Tree. For the past few weeks, the average number of changes made without any supporting sources has stabilized at about 87%. Anyone working on the Family Tree who has an extensive ancestry, such as one created by pioneer ancestors, should expect about that level of changes every week. If you have basically made your own entries in the Family Tree and do not connect to the huge number of people from New England or other such locations, the number of changes may be far lower. If you are watching people who were born before 1700, you may likely have many more changes than the average. I will be writing a more complete commentary and analysis in the near future.
Here is this weeks compilation. The email message is dated August 3, 2019, so this report adds changes from July 25, 2019, to that date. The most recent changes are in green so you can see which people have consistent changes.
Some out there will probably use this series as a justification for abandoning work on the Family Tree. These will probably be the same people who refuse to plant gardens because they might have to pull weeds. In anticipation of my forthcoming commentary, I would just note that the benefit of having the Family Tree far outweighs the time involved in maintenance.