Genealogy from the perspective of a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon, LDS)

Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Unfinished Attachments brings new discoveries to the FamilySearch Family Tree


You may or may not have noticed a new feature on the FamilySearch.org Family Tree: Unfinished Attachments. These new links tell users when there is more information in the source than has been attached to people in the Family Tree. If I click on one of the links, I will see one or more entries showing people who are listed in the document on the left side showing the record but not yet attached to anyone list of people in the Family Tree on the right side of the screen. Here is an example.


In this case, the first person listed in white indicating he is not attached, Henry M Tanner, is mentioned twice and is already attached above so this name can be ignored. The second name does not belong to the family but could be a relative and you might now have a research opportunity. In this particular case, the second name, J Golden Kimball, is not a relative and likewise could be ignored, but if you want to make sure all of the people are included you could find this person in the Family Tree and attach this record.

What this example does show is that there is sometimes a lot more information in the records than we initially extract and periodically reviewing the records could give you a whole new line of research.

For more complete instructions, see the FamilySearch Blog post, "New FamilySearch Feature “Unfinished Attachments” Brings New Discoveries to Your Tree."

I am finding a lot of skipped and omitted information because of this new feature.

3 comments:

  1. Would you please consider republishing this post to your blog, Genealogy's Star, so I can repost it on my Family History group on Facebook. I have written to Facebook several times complaining that they continue to block your Rejoice and be exceeding glad articles with no answer or results. Would it help to change the name of the blog?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I will republish the post with a different name on Genealogy's Star. No, it would not help to change the name of the blog, but I might try that anyway. Thanks for the comment.

      Delete