Moving Information into the FamilySearch Family Tree

Years ago, a group of people started a website that became Wikipedia. This huge online reference has become the "go to" place for general and specific information. No matter what you opinion is of the accuracy or reliability of Wikipedia, you still have to recognize that it exists and that it has become a fundamental source for all kinds of information. FamilySearch.org has started down the road of creating the "go to" place for genealogical information. No matter that similar online family trees exist, none of these other integrated family tree programs based on the wiki model have the resources and numbers of people that can potentially be involved with the FamilySearch.org Family Tree.

Sooner or later, the genealogical community is going to recognize that the Family Tree is rapidly becoming the focal point or clearing house for genealogical information. Let me give an example of how I think this is happening.

If I were just now starting my efforts to discover my family's history, where would I start? Suppose I had no knowledge at all about any of my ancestors, even my own parents. This does happen. There are plenty of people out there who do not know the identity of their own parents. But is that the rule? No. Most of us, to a greater or lesser degree, have some knowledge of our relatives. How do we start to find out more? Genealogists have been confronting this problem for a very long time. Whether we know about our family or not, we still have one and we have relatives far and wide around the world. Each time we go back one generation, we increase the probability that someone else in our family has already asked the same questions about our extended family relationships. The challenge is that historically, this information about our family was scattered all over the world.

Now we come to the FamilySearch.org Family Tree. Simply put, the Family Tree is a centralized clearing house or warehouse or whatever for storing and preserving family information for the entire world. It may seem presumptuous to take that position, but it is literally true. Information about the world's families is being added to the Family Tree and the data collections on FamilySearch.org at a phenomenal rate. But just as with Wikipedia, the hand wringing and criticisms focus on the Family Tree's limitations rather than on its strengths.

I spend some time almost every single day working with the FamilySearch.org Family Tree. I can see the potential but I also see the reality. The point where the Family Tree becomes the most reliable and most valuable source of family history information has already arrived. Where else can you go to find this much information concentrated in one place? All of the other major online websites have fragmented family trees or family trees that are not connected directly to sources. We need to stop worrying so much about the mechanics of the Family Tree and focus on what it has become: the basic starting point for information about the world's families.

What about the issues of reliability? They are real. But the cure for unreliability is verified information. Genealogy will always have a tentative, uncertain and unreliable component. That is the nature of historical research. The next big or small discovery can re-write history. But for nearly all of us, the basic information about our family connections will not radically change as more information is added to the Family Tree. As we go back in time, this will very likely happen with some lines, but over time, you will find that the Family Tree becomes more and more reliable. This will happen sooner than later if we all start moving our information into the Family Tree. This includes documents, photos, stories, dates, names, places, source citations, everything.

If you are hesitant about putting your information into the Family Tree, get over it. It is time for action. The more information we move into the Family Tree, the more reliable it will become. Not all at once, but incrementally. Get busy.